Withdraw troops, funding, and support from the United Nations. In addition, the UN should not be priviledge to headquarters within our soveriegn borders. Any organization (national or international) that elevates incoherent dictators to worldwide platforms on which to spew hate filled threats and blatant disregard for historic fact toward other sovereign nationalities deserve neither time nor support. Regardless, under no circimstances--even of the most favorable--should our military be subject to a foreign sovereignty.
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall
RogueOn.org
On The United Nations
On Immigration
Most of us can trace our heritage to back our immigrant forefathers. Some came willingly, some came forcefully. Immigration is as American as apple pie. The big scandal is illegal immigration and amnesty.
Millions are crossing the borders illegally to find a better life. The problem to date is that the Democratic party looks to these illegals as a new voting block, wishing to enslave them to sub-minimum wage jobs and poor education systems, hampering their chances to learn the language and build businesses and lives they can own in the United States.
The Republican party has dropped the ball by insisting that we simply oppose any outreach at all, allow the Democrats to enslave a race of people, and support little or no tolerance for the time it will take for immigrants to transfer from Spanish speaking people to bilingual English speaking people.
We need to pave the way for easier access to legal immigration and allow these new citizens the same rights and opportunities to learn and work as "native born" Americans--no more, no less.
Immigrants come to the United States because they want better lives for their families. Most believe in a Creator who created all of Humankind. Most are hard working, self-sufficient people. In short, they are a conservative people.
It's time the Republican party does the just and moral steps that are needed: tighten up security and keep those who would intend harm to us out and reach out to those who have so much in common with us despite a temporary language barrier.
Join this cause on RogueOn.org Latino Outreach. We need your help!
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall
On Property
If the state can tax property, you cannot own property. No citizen should face the threat of punishment or loss of property for failing to pay a government a "use tax" on property. Property is taxed at the point of purchase. Why must we pay an additional yearly "use tax?" Suppose a person has worked hard to purchase and pay for a home. Should the state be allowed to fine, imprison, or assume that property because the citizen, having already followed law and paid fair tax at purchase, find himself in a situation in which he can no longer afford the state's "use tax" on his property?
Property is a means of revenue at the point of purchase. It should not be taxed after the purchase. It should not be taxed at the death of the owner. One dollar should only be taxed once.
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall
On Taxes
The personal income tax is immoral, a theft upon the work of the private citizen, and a deterrent to individual success. Taxes are a necessity in funding the military and business of the Federal Government; however, the nature of the current system is upside down.
Tax laws need recodification. The Federal Government has assumed the power of the purse over the individual and the state, thus finding an economic means to usurp the 10th Amendment. Taxes should be codified in the manner that allows for two important reforms: (1) the monies should flow from the state upwards to the federal level, and (2) the tax should be one that is fair and voluntary upon the individual.
Each state should impose a tax system such as a sales tax. This becomes a voluntary tax as the individual pays taxes according the means and desires of the individual to purchase goods and services. In return, a system would be placed on the state to pay an portion of revenue to the federal government of which the amount would be determined based upon the same ratio as the electoral college.
Larger states which have more citizens thus requiring more service and creating more revenue would pay a higher portion than a smaller state. The larger state has more federal representation, the smaller less. Think taxation with representation rather than the upside down nature of our current system which burdens states withmandates which are unfunded or entices states to conform with federal "recommendations" with threat of withholding funds for unrelated projects and needs.
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall
On The Military
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall
Going Rogue Is Not Going Radical
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall
The Role of Federal Courts
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall
Limit The Federal Government
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall
Give Me Liberty
Talk about this on our Facebook Wall